The 2016 Public Policy Yearbook:
Tracking Research in Public Policy

Sarah Trousset
Hank Jenkins-Smith
Nina Carlson
Christopher Weible

Public Policy Yearbook Editors


The articles presented in this supplemental issue mark the eighth edition of the Policy Studies Journal’s Public Policy Yearbook. This issue includes four retrospective review articles summarizing recent developments in public policy research in four focus areas: defense and public policy, economic policy, environmental policy, and health policy. The issue also includes a set of special topic papers that discuss theories on the policy process, and publishing patterns found within public policy journals. We provide a brief description of these articles in greater detail below. You can also find the main content of the 2016 Yearbook online at: www.psjyearbook.com.

In addition to the annual publication of retrospective review articles in various policy subfields, a significant portion of our efforts with the PSJ Yearbook is providing avenues for readers to make connections with public policy scholars from around the world. The Public Policy Yearbook is an international listing of experts in various public policy domains, working on public policy problems all over the globe. Each year, we collect information from public policy scholars about their fields of study, research focus areas, published works and contact information.1 This information is then published as part of a directory of individual profiles on the Yearbook’s website. The multidisciplinary nature of public policy research can make it challenging to identify the experts studying various policy problems, and the Yearbook provides users with an easier way to do so. Our intent is to provide a convenient tool for policy scholars to increase and broaden the visibility of their work, as well as to provide a means to network with other scholars. By using the website, readers can search for an expert through a range of search criteria options, which include: a scholar’s first or last name, geographic location, institution, or primary research interests. By visiting the Yearbook’s website, www.psjyearbook.com, users can utilize a free web-based interface to easily search for various policy scholars’ contact information, as well as up-to-date summaries describing listed scholars’ self-reported descriptions of current and future research ideas and projects.

In this introduction we provide a brief snapshot of current developments in public policy research. We also briefly introduce the articles included in this supplemental issue. For more detailed information on the Yearbook website and 23 previously published retrospective review articles, we welcome readers to look at previously published editorial articles. In the 2013 and 2014 introductory articles (Jenkins-Smith, Trousset & Weible 2013; Trousset, Jenkins-Smith & Weible 2014), we presented a detailed description of the functionality of the Yearbook website, as well as a comparative look at developments in public policy research between 2009-2014. Last year, in the 2015 introductory article (Trousset, Jenkins-Smith, Carlson & Weible 2015), we presented a discussion on the progress of the Yearbook’s published, peer-reviewed retrospective review articles dating back to the launch of the series in 2011. A updated version of those discussions is presented below, but we invite readers to look back at previous articles for more detail at how developments identified within the Yearbook have evolved over time.

Characteristics of Yearbook Participants and New Developments in Policy Scholarship

As we do each year, in Fall 2015 we reached out to the Yearbook’s current listing of policy scholars, asking each member to update the information published on his or her profile.2 This annual updating process allows us as to verify the accuracy of listed scholars’ contact information and to encourage members to list recently published articles and/or their research in progress. As is evident in Figure 1, our most recent update shows that the Yearbook continues to represent a broad cross-section of policy scholars from around the world; the 2016 Yearbook has 877 members, working in 48 different countries. Approximately 74% of Yearbook members work within the United States and the remaining 26% of members work in 47 countries around the globe.

The Yearbook is inclusive of scholars at a wide variety of institutions globally. Figure 2 below shows the distribution of Yearbook members working across 6 continents. While the largest concentrations of Yearbook scholars are in North America and Europe, growing numbers are located in Asia, Latin America, Australia and New Zealand, and Africa.

Figure 1. The Yearbook’s geographic representation spans 48 different countries.

Figure 2. The Yearbook’s geographic representation spans 6 continents.

For those unfamiliar with the Yearbook, each year we use the self-reported content of Yearbook scholars’ profiles to develop indicators for public policy scholars’ evolving research agendas. The following discussion shows recent developments and patterns in the research foci of 877 scholars included in the 2016 Yearbook. We use several descriptive indicators that summarize and characterize scholars’ evolving research agendas, including scholars’ self-reported descriptions of their “current and future research expectations” and scholars’ self-placement within 18 theoretical and substantive focus subfields of public policy.3

First, Yearbook scholars are asked to provide a paragraph describing their current and ongoing research agendas. When writing this paragraph, scholars may be as brief or as detailed as they choose. By scanning the content in the 2016 current research summary paragraphs, we can illustrate current trends among scholars’ work by creating a word cloud populated by frequently used terms (see Figure 3). The word cloud provides a graphical representation of the aggregate foci of scholars’ substantive and theoretical work, and provides us with a comparative perspective of the evolution of research agendas. Figure 3 presents the 150 terms that appeared most frequently in the “Current and Future Research Expectations” section of scholars’ profiles and any additional keyword tags that scholars supplied to describe their research agendas. In 2016, the prominent research interests, characterized by the eleven most frequently appearing terms, include the following: political; environmental; social; governance; management; education; university; development; science; analysis; and health. When comparing this word cloud with those from the past 6 years (Jenkins-Smith & Trousset 2010, 2011; Jenkins-Smith, Trousset, & Weible 2012, 2013; Trousset, Jenkins-Smith & Weible 2014; Trousset, Jenkins-Smith, Carlson & Weible 2015), it appears that the proportion of research trends among Yearbook members has remained stable over time.

Figure 3. The relative size of each term denotes the frequency with which key terms appear in scholars’ listing of their “Current and Future Research Expectations”.

The trends identified within the “Current and Future Research Expectations” section of scholars’ profiles are consistent with Yearbook members’ self-identifications in the Yearbook’s listed public policy focus areas. When scholars are asked to update the information listed on their profiles, they are presented with a list of 18 categories that represent a broad spectrum of subfields in public policy scholarship. They are first asked to check as many of the categories as they choose to describe their research agendas. In addition, for the last several years, we asked scholars to indicate which category best describes their primary theoretical focus area and which best describes their primary substantive focus area. The five theoretical focus areas include: agenda-setting, adoption and implementation; policy analysis; policy history; policy process theory; and public opinion. The thirteen substantive focus areas include: comparative public policy; defense and security policy; economic policy; education policy; energy and natural resource policy; environmental policy; governance; health policy; international relations and policy; law and policy; science and technology policy; social policy; and urban public policy.

Figure 4. Scholars’ primary theoretical focus area.

Figure 5. Scholars’ primary substantive focus area.

Figures 4 & 5 show the proportion of scholars indicating one of the theoretical and substantive specializations as their primary focus area. As shown in Figure 4, the most prominent theoretical focus area was policy analysis and evaluation. The second and third most common areas were policy process theory and agenda-setting, adoption and implementation. As shown in Figure 5, across the substantive focus areas the largest proportion of scholars study issues in governance, environmental policy, and social policy. These were also the most prominent categories in 2014 and 2015.

Public Policy Research Retrospective Review Articles

In addition to the Yearbook’s listing of experts in various public policy domains, each year we also publish a set of review papers that summarize recent developments in public policy research. We have included four new retrospective review articles in this special issue. These review articles offer readers quick access to recent developments in various policy subfields, because they can provide both a basic introduction and a coherent current perspective on the field to emerging scholars interested in understanding various policy problems. To write these review articles, each year we solicit recommendations for advanced graduate students working under the guidance of leading public policy scholars. This year, as part of this supplemental issue of the Policy Studies Journal, we are including second iteration review articles on the topic of research in economic policy, environmental policy, defense and public policy, and health policy. These articles contain key developments in the following areas:

Economic Policy: Komla Dzigbede focuses on three subdomains to characterize recently published research on American economic policy research. First, he discusses scholarly efforts to understand the influence of monetary and fiscal policy variables on outcomes such as employment and income. Second, he discusses research on the politics of regulation. Finally, he summarizes research examining how factors such as the media, interest groups, and lobbyists influence political attention and policy narratives in the policy process. To see the first iteration review article for Economic Policy, see Barry Pump’s review (2012).

Environmental Policy: Bridget Fahey and Sarah Pralle review recent research in the field of environmental policy. The research they identify examines a range of political factors that shape the context of of policies concerning climate change, ecosystem management and sustainable development. Recent writing on environmental policy has investigated questions about public participation, governance, and multi-level policy development and implementation. Fahey and Pralle also discuss how scholarly inquiries in environmental policy have employed multiple methods of analysis. To see the first iteration review article for Environmental Policy, see Meredith Niles and Mark Lubell’s review (2012).

Defense and Public Policy: Brandon Archuleta discusses the current state of defense and national security policy by examining recent research focused on the institutions and processes that structure U.S. policymaking. In his review, he summarizes published research by policy scholars, international relations scholars, diplomatic historians and scholar-practioners. In doing so, Archuleta provides a multi-disciplinary perspective of how scholars are examining national security policy. This includes scholarship focusing on the influences of institutions (such as the National Security Council, bureaucracy, or industry) on national security policies. In addition, Archuleta summarizes research on defense and public policy at various stages of the policy process including: agenda-setting, policy formulation and implementation. To see the first iteration review article for Defense and Public Policy, see Joseph Ripberger’s review (2011).

Health Policy: Lisa Frazier summarizes a range of research conducted by policy scholars investigating broader impacts in health policy. Frazier argues that recent scholarly inquiries are concentrated on topics including: health science (biomedicine and public health); health economics; health care services; and health informatics. To see the first iteration review article for Health Policy, see Simon Haeder’s review (2012).

In addition, as with prior issues, we include a selection of articles that are of broad interest to public policy scholars that, for various reasons, may not readily find a home in traditional peer-reviewed journals. This year we include a paper on an important methodological tool for researchers undertaking text-based analyses within the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework (Watkins and Westphal); a tongue-in cheek assessment of the frontiers in the construction of synthetic public policy frameworks and theories (Koski, Workman and Breunig); and an innovative analysis of the networks of citations across journals that, collectively, provide the published basis for public policy scholarship (Adams, Infeld, Wikrent and Cisse).

We hope that scholars continue to utilize these review articles as a quick way to update themselves on the current state of research within specific focus areas. We invite you to read previously published review articles, which can be found on the Yearbook’s website or within previous volumes of the PSJ. We also encourage you to recommend outstanding graduate students to author future iterations of retrospective reviews.

Final Remarks

Our goal is to make the Yearbook a convenient and accessible tool for scholars, practitioners, students, or laypersons to find the right scholars, articles and networks working on a the full range of public policy questions. The Yearbook is intended to be a continuously updated resource for networking and collaboration amongst scholars, as well a no-cost platform for scholars to publicize their research accomplishments and active projects. The Yearbook is a valuable resource for students of public policy and public management who need to dig deeper into policy questions and seek ready access the current state of research in their policy domain of interest.

If you are interested in updating an existing profile or if you are not currently listed but are interested in becoming a member of the Yearbook, we have made several improvements to our system to ease the process of creating a profile. Scholars can access their profiles at any time and make direct changes to their listings. Users can select from two different updating options by visiting the Yearbook website at: http://www.psjyearbook.com/person/update.

The first option is for scholars who already have a listed profile. On the webpage listed above, under the tab “Current Members,” scholars can submit the email address they currently have on file with the Yearbook. Our system will then immediately send a personalized link via email that the scholar can use to access their current profile information. By visiting that personalized link, scholars can submit changes to their profile listings and these changes will be updated on the Yearbook website immediately.

The second option is for policy scholars who do not yet have a listed profile, but who would like to become a member of the Yearbook. Scholars can list their profile at no charge. By visiting webpage listed above, scholars can click the tab labeled “Submit Your Information,” or can go directly to our easy-to-use form at: http://psjyearbook.com/entry/addme. Once scholars submit their profile information, our system will await approval by an editor to list that profile on the website.4 Once that initial profile has been approved, scholars can go back in and edit their profiles immediately, as described in the previous paragraph. If you have any questions about this process, we welcome you to contact us at: psjyearbook@gmail.com.

Although scholars are able to access their profiles at any time and make direct changes to their listings, we will continue running an annual fall recruitment and updating campaign. In the annual fall campaign we send invitations to both current and potential new policy scholars to update their entries in the Yearbook. We do this to ensure that the Yearbook content stays as up-to-date as possible. We will continue our efforts to include faculty from public policy and public management schools and departments across the globe, as well as reaching out to graduate students, post-docs, and practitioners in public policy that make up the next generation of leaders in public policy research and analysis. We ask that current members assist in this effort by forwarding our invitations to affiliate policy scholars, practitioners, and graduate students.

Finally, the production and operation of the Yearbook could not have been accomplished without the help of many hands. We would like to recognize Matthew Henderson for the design and implementation of the online website, web-tools, and data graphics. In addition, we thank Courtney Thornton for her help in editing Yearbook entries and review articles. Additionally, we are thankful for the support and help we receive from several individuals at the Policy Studies Organization and Wiley-Blackwell. Finally, we would like to thank Dr. Paul Rich, President of the Policy Studies Organization, for his financial support and encouragement for the Yearbook.

We hope that you will find the Yearbook to be a valuable resource in your work on public policy and hope you will continue to submit updates to your entries in the future.

Sarah Trousset
Hank C. Jenkins-Smith
Nina Carlson
Chris Weible
Yearbook Editors

Trousset

1 Yearbook membership is free of charge and open to all policy scholars and practitioners worldwide. Since the Yearbook’s inception in 2009, we have sought to broaden the participation of public policy scholars across disciplines, organizations, and nations. The challenge is that, given the nature of public policy research, the domain of public policy scholars and practitioners is highly varied. Public policy research is multidisciplinary in nature, and policy scholars and practitioners inhabit a wide range of institutional settings (universities, governmental agencies, research labs, nonprofit organizations, think tanks, and many others). Initially our invitations were sent to the listed members of the Public Policy Section of the American Political Science Association, as well as members of the Policy Studies Organization. We worked with editors of public policy journals to reach policy scholars globally. More recently we sent electronic and printed invitations to public policy and public administration departments across the United States and Europe, asking each department to forward the invitation to their public policy faculty members, graduate students, and affiliates. Lastly, our online member updating system allows for current and new members to offer contact information for colleagues and graduate students who should be included. We are currently seeking to expand the scope of invitations to include major practitioner and scholarly organizations focused on public policy, such as the Association for Policy Analysis and Management (APPAM). In all cases, we undertake an active recruitment and update effort in the fall of each year to be sure our content is up to date and as broadly inclusive as possible.

2 Although we undertake a systematic recruitment effort once a year, it is important to note that scholars can update their profiles or join the Yearbook at any time. The website allows scholars to easily access their profiles by submitting their email address on the website profile management portal. The Yearbook’s website also allows for new members to join, at no cost, through the use of a short online form. This process is described in greater detail in Section 1 of this introductory article.

3 When updating their profiles, scholars are asked to check off as many categories as are applicable to describe their research agendas.

4 This initial approval is necessary to avoid publishing “spam.”


Works Cited



  • Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., and Sarah Trousset. 2010. “2010 Public Policy Yearbook.” Policy Studies Journal 38 (s1): xi-xiii.
  • Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., and Sarah Trousset. 2011. “2011 Public Policy Yearbook.” Policy Studies Journal 39 (s1): vii-xiii.
  • Jenkins, Smith, Hank C., Sarah Trousset, and Chris Weible. 2012. “2012 Public Policy Yearbook: Evolving Scholarship in Public Policy.” Policy Studies Journal 40 (s1): 1-9.
  • Jenkins, Smith, Hank C., Sarah Trousset, and Chris Weible. 2013. “2013 Public Policy Yearbook: Evolving Scholarship in Public Policy.” Policy Studies Journal 41 (s1): 1-10.
  • Haeder, Simon F. 2012. “Beyond Path Dependence: Explaining Healthcare Reform and Its Consequences.” Policy Studies Journal 40 (s1): 65-86.
  • Niles, Meredith T., and Mark Lubell. “Integrative Frontiers in Environmental Policy Theory and Research.” Policy Studies Journal 40 (s1): 41-64.
  • Pump, Barry. 2012. “A New Normal? American Economic Policymaking After The Great Recession.” Policy Studies Journal 40 (s1): 27-40.
  • Ripberger, Joseph T. 2011. “Whither Civil Defense and Homeland Security in the Study of Public Policy? A Look at Research on the Policy, the Public, and the Process.” Policy Studies Journal 39 (s1): 77-91.
  • Trousset, Sarah, Hank C. Jenkins-Smith, and Chris Weible. 2014. “2014 Public Policy Yearbook: Recent Developments in Public Policy Research.” Policy Studies Journal 42 (s1): 1-11.
  • Trousset, Sarah, Hank C. Jenkins-Smith, Nina Carlson, and Chris Weible. 2015. “2015 Public Policy Yearbook: Tracking Research in Public Policy.” Policy Studies Journal 43 (s1): 1-11.